Project
Protecting the health of La Oroya's residents from toxic pollution
For more than 20 years, residents of La Oroya have been seeking justice and reparations after a metallurgical complex caused heavy metal pollution in their community—in violation of their fundamental rights—and the government failed to take adequate measures to protect them.
On March 22, 2024, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights issued its judgment in the case. It found Peru responsible and ordered it to adopt comprehensive reparation measures. This decision is a historic opportunity to restore the rights of the victims, as well as an important precedent for the protection of the right to a healthy environment in Latin America and for adequate state oversight of corporate activities.
Background
La Oroya is a small city in Peru’s central mountain range, in the department of Junín, about 176 km from Lima. It has a population of around 30,000 inhabitants.
There, in 1922, the U.S. company Cerro de Pasco Cooper Corporation installed the La Oroya Metallurgical Complex to process ore concentrates with high levels of lead, copper, zinc, silver and gold, as well as other contaminants such as sulfur, cadmium and arsenic.
The complex was nationalized in 1974 and operated by the State until 1997, when it was acquired by the US Doe Run Company through its subsidiary Doe Run Peru. In 2009, due to the company's financial crisis, the complex's operations were suspended.
Decades of damage to public health
The Peruvian State - due to the lack of adequate control systems, constant supervision, imposition of sanctions and adoption of immediate actions - has allowed the metallurgical complex to generate very high levels of contamination for decades that have seriously affected the health of residents of La Oroya for generations.
Those living in La Oroya have a higher risk or propensity to develop cancer due to historical exposure to heavy metals. While the health effects of toxic contamination are not immediately noticeable, they may be irreversible or become evident over the long term, affecting the population at various levels. Moreover, the impacts have been differentiated —and even more severe— among children, women and the elderly.
Most of the affected people presented lead levels higher than those recommended by the World Health Organization and, in some cases, higher levels of arsenic and cadmium; in addition to stress, anxiety, skin disorders, gastric problems, chronic headaches and respiratory or cardiac problems, among others.
The search for justice
Over time, several actions were brought at the national and international levels to obtain oversight of the metallurgical complex and its impacts, as well as to obtain redress for the violation of the rights of affected people.
AIDA became involved with La Oroya in 1997 and, since then, we’ve employed various strategies to protect public health, the environment and the rights of its inhabitants.
In 2002, our publication La Oroya Cannot Wait helped to make La Oroya's situation visible internationally and demand remedial measures.
That same year, a group of residents of La Oroya filed an enforcement action against the Ministry of Health and the General Directorate of Environmental Health to protect their rights and those of the rest of the population.
In 2006, they obtained a partially favorable decision from the Constitutional Court that ordered protective measures. However, after more than 14 years, no measures were taken to implement the ruling and the highest court did not take action to enforce it.
Given the lack of effective responses at the national level, AIDA —together with an international coalition of organizations— took the case to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) and in November 2005 requested measures to protect the right to life, personal integrity and health of the people affected. In 2006, we filed a complaint with the IACHR against the Peruvian State for the violation of the human rights of La Oroya residents.
In 2007, in response to the petition, the IACHR granted protection measures to 65 people from La Oroya and in 2016 extended them to another 15.
Current Situation
To date, the protection measures granted by the IACHR are still in effect. Although the State has issued some decisions to somewhat control the company and the levels of contamination in the area, these have not been effective in protecting the rights of the population or in urgently implementing the necessary actions in La Oroya.
Although the levels of lead and other heavy metals in the blood have decreased since the suspension of operations at the complex, this does not imply that the effects of the contamination have disappeared because the metals remain in other parts of the body and their impacts can appear over the years. The State has not carried out a comprehensive diagnosis and follow-up of the people who were highly exposed to heavy metals at La Oroya. There is also a lack of an epidemiological and blood study on children to show the current state of contamination of the population and its comparison with the studies carried out between 1999 and 2005.
The case before the Inter-American Court
As for the international complaint, in October 2021 —15 years after the process began— the IACHR adopted a decision on the merits of the case and submitted it to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, after establishing the international responsibility of the Peruvian State in the violation of human rights of residents of La Oroya.
The Court heard the case at a public hearing in October 2022. More than a year later, on March 22, 2024, the international court issued its judgment. In its ruling, the first of its kind, it held Peru responsible for violating the rights of the residents of La Oroya and ordered the government to adopt comprehensive reparation measures, including environmental remediation, reduction and mitigation of polluting emissions, air quality monitoring, free and specialized medical care, compensation, and a resettlement plan for the affected people.
Partners:
Related projects
Transition minerals: value chains and cirularity from a Latin American perspective
The global push for renewable energy to reduce climate-aggravating emissions has revealed how the environmental and social costs of mineral extraction fall disproportionately on local communities and ecosystems. The rush for so-called “critical” minerals exacerbates the very crises it seeks to help solve, worsening ecological degradation and perpetuating socio-economic injustice in the Global South. The circular economy allows the development of new economic and governance models to overcome the linearity of the international trade system. From a Latin American perspective, the circular economy must incorporate ecological parameters to ensure the maintenance of ecosystem services and the value of raw materials, while respecting the human rights of those who depend on the ecosystems from which these raw materials are extracted. AIDA is a pioneering regional organization that uses the law and science to protect the right to a healthy environment in Latin America. Focused on strengthening the just energy transition, AIDA's work includes an emphasis on value chains and circular economy models from a Latin American perspective. The race for lithium from the perspective of place Andean wetlands are a series of highly biodiverse ecosystems that provide multiple ecosystem services. However, these ecosystems are highly fragile and are currently threatened by the climate crisis, water crisis, and mining pressures, particularly regarding lithium. The Gran Atacama, located in the high Andean wetlands of Chile, Bolivia and Argentina, is estimated to contain approximately 68 percent of global lithium reserves, in the form of brine. As such, the mining industry has renamed this region to focus on one mineral, calling it the “lithium triangle.” The reality is that the area is much more complex than just its minerals. In the Gran Atacama, local communities and indigenous peoples depend on the stability of the ecosystem for their cultural, social and economic well-being. Economic activities there are linked to agriculture, industrial employment, bureaucratic services, and tourism. Sixty percent of lithium deposits are in areas of medium, high and extremely high-water risk. At least 30 ongoing lithium mining projects in various stages of development have been identified throughout the Gran Atacama. Public opinion in these three countries has demonstrated significant concerns about the lithium mining industry and the sustainability of these activities, particularly in relation to a history of mismanagement of environmental liabilities in the past. A circular economy perspective is essential for sustainability The current climate crisis is linked to the linear nature of our current economic system and its assumption of infinite natural resources. The history of large-scale mining activities in the Global South exemplifies this perspective. The circular economy could offer a solution to create a more sustainable value chain for raw minerals and enable a just energy transition that benefits all regions of the world. However, the following points must be considered: The drivers and barriers for creating a circular economy within mining processes may vary from region to region. Building a global circular economy for lithium needs to encompass the material extraction stage more comprehensively, not only through industrial circularity activities, but also from an ecosystem and human rights perspective. The loss of natural capital in lithium-exporting countries is a major concern, not only because of material extraction, but also because of its impact on ecosystems. In Latin America, non-renewable natural capital represents 3.2 percent of total wealth, while natural capital represents 10.9 percent. Intensive extraction without recognizing environmental and human rights concerns depletes natural wealth, some of which is already used by local populations. A circular economy for raw materials must balance the extraction of minerals with the preservation of ecosystems. Economic mechanisms must be found to prevent the replacement of natural capital with technological capital, to create a truly circular economy. Tariff inequality for critical minerals, including lithium, is widespread and results in an uneven distribution of economic benefits along the value chain of raw minerals. Market rules impose low tariffs on critical raw materials, while high tariffs are applied to technology and specialized labor, neglecting the added value of natural resources. This results in lost potential to generate further profits in subsequent stages of the value chain. Economic mechanisms are needed to support ecosystem conservation, proper management and economic valuation of nature, and to address the inherent inequality and linearity of the current economic system. A circular economy proposal from territories of extraction The lithium value chain is transnational, and each region involved has different actions to take to achieve a global circular economy. Circularity in mining areas depends on the conservation of ecosystems that contain lithium and other minerals. Since raw materials are extracted from these ecosystems, our mission is to preserve them and plan the use of non-renewable resources from an ecological perspective, respecting biophysical limits and human rights. In this regard, from the perspective of the extractive regions, the proposal can be related to: Strengthening the circular economy perspective in and from extractive regions and increasing knowledge sharing with other regions, both in the global North and South. Expanding the concept of a global circular economy for lithium to include an ecosystem perspective in extraction planning, rather than focusing solely on a supply and demand perspective. Appropriate valuation of both non-renewable resources and the ecosystems in which they are located, through the exploration of environmental taxation mechanisms that could be integrated into the mining sector to: Create clear market signals about the value of natural and non-renewable resources and reduce the demand for intensive extraction of raw materials. Generate revenues to ensure a fair share of directly affected communities through benefit-sharing mechanisms and to facilitate increased investment in technologies to advance the circular economy faster and more efficiently. Ensuring timely and adequate compensation for contamination. Developing proposals for economic models that incorporate the ecosystem services and materials used or affected during lithium production. For example, implementing specific carbon pricing for mining activities and strengthening legal mechanisms based on the “producer responsibility” and “the polluter pays” principles.
Read more
Organisations demand justice in criminalization case against Rigoberto Juárez, ancestral authority and environmental and human rights defender of Guatemala
Organisations dedicated to the protection of human rights defenders, and national and international organisations working on the promotion and protection of human rights and indigenous peoples rights, express our concern over the criminalization process against Rigoberto Juárez, ancestral authority, environmental and human rights defender, and general coordinator of the Plurinational Ancestral Government of the Original Nations Mayas Akateka, Chuj, Q’anjob’al y Popti’.The judicial process against Rigoberto began in 2015 due to his role as a mediator and ancestral authority in a land conflict within the Q'anjob'al territory, specifically in the Ixquisis micro-region. This conflict arose from the indigenous Maya community's resistance to the poorly implemented and unconsulted hydroelectric projects by Energía y Renovación S.A., financed by BID Invest.The judicial process lacked an intercultural and differentiated approach. Additionally, the decisions made in the second instance and by the cassation court have ignored the factual and legal arguments presented by the defense regarding Rigoberto Juárez's role as an ancestral authority, which involved, at the community's request, assuming a mediator role in the high-conflict situation.From the perspective of the signing organizations, this judicial process has been used as a reprisal mechanism against the human rights defender’s legitimate human rights work. In particular, due to his crucial role in bringing visibility to, and reporting on, the Ixquisis case through a complaint submitted to the Independent Consultation and Investigation Mechanism (MICI) of the Inter-American Development Bank. Evidence of this can be found in the temporal overlaps of this process with crucial moments of the complaint filed with the MICI.In view of this concerning situation, we request judicial authorities to consider the arguments submitted by the legal defense of Rigoberto Juárez in the amparo action filed on 22 August and to make a decision that takes into account the specific guarantees of Rigoberto Juárez as an ancestral authority and as an environmental and human rights defender. Likewise, we call on international human rights institutions to urge the State of Guatemala to resolve the case of Rigoberto in accordance with their international obligations, and to prevent and address the serious trend of criminalization of indigenous authorities exercising their rights and responsibilities. Signed by:International Platform against ImpunityProtection International MesoaméricaInteramerican Association for Environmental Defense (AIDA)Franciscans InternationalRed Nacional por la Defensa de la Soberanía Alimentaria en Guatemala (REDSAG)Bank Information CenterInternational Service for Human RightsFront Line DefendersNISGUA (Network in Solidarity with the People of Guatemala)ASERJUSP. Marco Tulio Recinos Torres. CPPS.Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL)María Eugenia Solís GarcíaAlba Cecilia del Rosario Mérida PiedrasantaPress contact:Víctor Quintanilla (Mexico), AIDA, [email protected], +521 5570522107
Read more
The Manaus Declaration on Human Rights in the Climate Emergency
Indigenous Peoples, local communities, Afrodescendants, tribal and rural communities, children and adolescents, women, LGBTQI+, non-governmental organizations, platforms, institutions, and individuals urge the Court and States to adopt minimum standards for the protection of human rights in the context of the climate emergency, as elaborated during the public hearings of the Advisory Opinion, particularly the one held in Manaus, Brazil, from May 25-29, where communities, peoples and civil society of the region met in an unprecedented judicial setting.We notice that the overall balance, after more than 30 years of international discussions regarding the climate emergency, is regrettable, as there is no evidence of an effective commitment by States to avoid greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, to grant reparations to those who have suffered climate damage, and to ensure that changes in their internal laws and policies, including economic policies, are compatible with the average global temperature limit set in the Paris Agreement.We highlight that several international courts, including the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, have the historic opportunity to formally clarify the human rights obligations of States in the context of the climate emergency through its advisory function, and in that sense, to set robust standards for the protection of rights based on current international standards relating to the protection those populations that have been historically excluded and discriminated against, and that are significantly more vulnerable to the climate emergency. Read and download the declaration
Read more